LLM Evaluation

Evaluated by: xiaomi/mimo-v2-flash:free

Last evaluated: March 29, 2026

Prompt Quality

3.0 /5

Evaluation error: RetryError[]

Usefulness

3.0 /5

Evaluation error: RetryError[]

Overall Rating

3.0 /5

Evaluation failed

Prompt Preview

---
name: scientific-critical-thinking
description: Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.
allowed-tools: Read Write Edit Bash
license: MIT license
metadata:
    skill-author: K-Dense Inc.
---

# Sc...

Full prompt length: 23699 characters

Tools & Technologies

  • python