Scientific Critical Evaluation and Peer Review

- [ ] Summary statement clearly conveys overall assessment

Scientific View Source →

LLM Evaluation

Evaluated by: xiaomi/mimo-v2-flash:free

Last evaluated: March 29, 2026

Prompt Quality

3.0 /5

Evaluation error: RetryError[]

Usefulness

3.0 /5

Evaluation error: RetryError[]

Overall Rating

3.0 /5

Evaluation failed

Prompt Preview

---
name: peer-review
description: Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.
allowed-tools: Read Write Edi...

Full prompt length: 23110 characters

Tools & Technologies

• python
• Python